Re: No nested <meta> elements?
Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:40:44 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> It isn't allowed to add a <meta> element inside another <meta>, right? Is there
> a specific reason for this? What would your take on allowing nested <meta>s?
The new meta element isn’t allowed in very many places. It’s a child of
info (and a few bibliographic elements), to provide generic metadata.
Having a generic element means users don’t have to resort to tag abuse
of, for example, bibliomisc, as I have so often done.
Yes, it allows content, and you can put pretty much anything you want in
it, but it’s not a general sort of container for anything. It’s supposed
to be metadata.
What would the use case be for nested meta elements?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]>
https://nwalsh.com/
> Taste ripens at the expense of happiness.--Jules Renard
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE1ury//rzuvqf7fN/hVWfHhJMAHkFAmI0cP0ACgkQhVWfHhJM AHmtCw/+N/erzaPdeNDt3I3iUToopL5ihFYr0+gls3vPNLtVSEa9x5Hys06BZqQk oUQRMTeqLZARR0gCn3G8yFUTPbMV+GqbS35Pfdelw3rtUtG957HruCL3NAK/jEXc KpC2LoIsiM0D3jKLV+ncRQLXZmOFemCwN2Lzf/RyhAnW3zZX6SCOTqaDIUsgHBZP hW7ocRNEsyYET/dG8eyUDkutm5SI8zulWMQCdT0uoszloUJtIGxWr/QzT+F+JtKx 1iq2FpZbBbmbzgjz6GyifrmoPQ8BXd4pF8NS7m6GPNKzWYZWIOoVi/c/38QGLyOS RGVeVkCYpOEWUN34AzIaVj3glggTp7gfnDY+qW+mMWSmtA/1bapqzr0LUi9PMOTH uDXSCsFQYWL7+ASTD6WBhVx7Jtn+muDx8Wc8mBryC/u2TrXJaCFaSMuiWWwdhpMT jrElIwWTTAqJjCvlBnFKdtca7aDzF5ItdgU2q6yiNkc7uSk6KDm88RdvEO5lJNak Kd4j0clvjD9m/1Fdn8gRALG52d7V8VE0vVb5fcoYSK4U/oJ3v4m3M/KF3PgTywfb WqUAFEXeOw9aE3Eqb7BpAOV8+aJPgqhamcjUnFPPeKoeJ0wwwExSiUbzW+STbuak qMxsmhDfKA3T58CegwsYF/W1SwFdSdCCSlIkkmVOYZaVnY5wNcY= =nDLY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----