Re: No nested <meta> elements?

Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:40:44 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.text.docbook.misc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> It isn't allowed to add a <meta> element inside another <meta>, right? Is there
> a specific reason for this? What would your take on allowing nested <meta>s?

The new meta element isn’t allowed in very many places. It’s a child of
info (and a few bibliographic elements), to provide generic metadata.
Having a generic element means users don’t have to resort to tag abuse
of, for example, bibliomisc, as I have so often done.

Yes, it allows content, and you can put pretty much anything you want in
it, but it’s not a general sort of container for anything. It’s supposed
to be metadata.

What would the use case be for nested meta elements?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]>
https://nwalsh.com/

> Taste ripens at the expense of happiness.--Jules Renard
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=nDLY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----