Re: DocBook 5.2 Candidate Release 1 -- Validating against schematron rules

Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Tue, 17 May 2022 10:20:45 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.text.docbook.misc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Richard Hamilton <[email protected]> writes:
> I see that the issue was resolved, but it’s not clear to me what
> validation method we should now use (I presume it’s no longer jing).

I had forgotten that Jing did Schematron validation. I suppose that’s
just a somewhat out of date implementation.

I’m using SchXslt (https://github.com/schxslt/schxslt) in my XProc
implementations.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]>
https://nwalsh.com/

> A committee is organic rather than mechanical in its nature: it is not
> a structure but a plant. It takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts,
> and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom in
> their turn.--C. Northcote Parkinson
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=taNY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----