Re: DocBook 5.2 Candidate Release 1 -- Validating against schematron rules
Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Tue, 17 May 2022 10:20:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Richard Hamilton <[email protected]> writes: > I see that the issue was resolved, but it’s not clear to me what > validation method we should now use (I presume it’s no longer jing). I had forgotten that Jing did Schematron validation. I suppose that’s just a somewhat out of date implementation. I’m using SchXslt (https://github.com/schxslt/schxslt) in my XProc implementations. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> https://nwalsh.com/ > A committee is organic rather than mechanical in its nature: it is not > a structure but a plant. It takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts, > and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom in > their turn.--C. Northcote Parkinson
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE1ury//rzuvqf7fN/hVWfHhJMAHkFAmKDaZQACgkQhVWfHhJM AHnJ9w/9FYBN7EIyvRJr0NrkllSXWDtmler3N1Epb/BkifSwC6Q2gEtK9xWA3AST a2ls7tYNFl9E/T6I8pM6zA1KepaJsYr3PzalI6894oWh3LX07REKTSES5QDv1VQC Rklfp5LyTdXsK6ozUe2mvYaiFcqEQt9N7pUhRUIdH6QPqaymlCf5n76ZMi6qOvVb YaAd90oY0O9zsG6uuDnF8eWHK1Hdbs9j9QX5LsHkLL8aoWcLkCVTiBDLHb/oALcv tB8GNuUpHCcALGDD1q1sky4Ysrsa4BuCnYRp9ZvkhTmaRwsBzMsPYaTOvwe/l6OY ueQI/hR5XtFv1iJsl9dQU+AaUtIHRq4tNGqU6FeeDxJn7tYD/MecDQkfqdmXkTsH J8RwVE2XUYA0ee6kLaBw1T9yaJHb5GR1f3nku0yya9WWTdeq3DdTSVZVJWvfq0NG cvHA4VvVSWpOibqedefk4yNmOhKuB42btEeUBRJMyV9WH0GtIepRasj8Yefucvbd Oteth0Cv9/n6yU4oJIngHm2BBkiYuv6q7jL5rwcmvESHsN9JJRKVcxLkRuYpu3kU d9RWLsZX1w20swAGmKVQoE/vO7ybiU5JRrRlW+g94jCL0Rt+VhGg22IEx9qrDLDY EA5OpT253+iy5I48LXpwLkdyoNMRKcee8f5RDjoJiVU99SN/v/g= =taNY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----