Re: The development of other explicit namespace attributes in DocBook 5.2
Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:00:44 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "John L. Clark" <[email protected]> writes: > It seems that this is an innovation that happened between DocBook 5.1 > and DocBook 5.2, and I am curious to read the discussion around this > development. Does anyone know where I can read about the work that the > TC did in coming up with this enhancement? (Maybe on the mailing list > somewhere? It's a bit hard to search.) It=E2=80=99s a bit impossible to search right now since OASIS seems to be relying on MarkMail for this and MarkMail has been shut down! I found the PR that did it[1], where I expected to find a pointer to the discussion. (We do try to make the records easy to follow!) Digging around in my personal email archive from around that time, I discovered a private email discussion with a user where I suggested using namespaced attributes and they reported that it didn=E2=80=99t work in Oxygen. That=E2=80=99s followed by some email with the editors (that really should = have been CC:=E2=80=99d to this list, apologies) where I said something like =E2= =80=9CI thought we already allowed this, did I screw up?=E2=80=9D and they all agre= ed that they thought this was allowed (they were kind enough not to comment on whether or not I=E2=80=99d screwed up). So it was technically added in 5.2CR3, I believe, and appears explicitly in the release notes for 5.2CR4. Further searching didn=E2=80=99t reveal anything specific, but I didn=E2=80= =99t go that far back. My guess is that after we allowed elements from any namespace in the info wrapper, it was a short step to allowing attributes in any namespace on any element. DocBook doesn=E2=80=99t generally try to be overly prescriptive. > Also, I don't see this change > listed in The Definitive Guide[2], but it seems valuable enough to > list as one of the major changes. What do you all think about listing > it there? Sure[2]. Be seeing you, norm [1] https://github.com/docbook/docbook/issues/236 [2] https://github.com/docbook/defguide/issues/107 =2D- Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/ > Some disguised deceits counterfeit truth so perfectly that not to be > taken in by them would be an error of judgment.--La Rochefoucauld --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQSEJUqRvjpp8yLt8uKDEiZHbwv9OwUCZaeCYAAKCRCDEiZHbwv9 O4IrAPoCvMxvnU8kpZWgMXFN351nndzvXnOFrDT2s5jQJNYWtQEAnry3Q8TWLPp0 san5tGTVBhTDYEkv0YYwQfshLQbhpgc= =AtEL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--