Re: [docutils:feature-requests] #81 0.17.1: pytest is failing
Guenter Milde via Docutils-develop <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Adam, dear Docutils developers,
an update on the test suite refactoring:
On 2022-11-19, Guenter Milde via Docutils-develop wrote:
> On 2022-11-10, Adam Turner via Docutils-develop wrote:
>
>> With [r9237] the test-suite refactoring project is complete -- using
>> `pytest` and `python -m unittest` now work "out-of-the-box".
>
> Thank you for picking up the large project of modernising and
> "disentangling" the Docutils test suite.
...
> # ./alltests.py
> [...]
> Ran 1739 tests in 5.053s
...
> #> pytest-3 --quiet .
...
> 369 passed, 2 skipped, 621 warnings in 6.50s
>
> * Only 369 out of 1739 tests reported by "alltests.py" are reported.
> Is this different counting or does pytest miss more than half of the tests?
>
* The warnings do not show up when testing with `alltest.py`
> It seems `pytest` bypasses this and reports anyway??
Fortunately, the report does not stand in the way, so we can leave this as-is.
> #> python3.9 -m unittest .
...
> ValueError: Empty module name
I could fix the import errors, now I get::
Ran 377 tests in 5.045s
377 << 1739, missing coverage or different counting?
>
> The "nose" test framework fails, too::
Fixed but also not all test are found::
> nosetests3
.........................S..........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 68 tests in 0.320s
OK (SKIP=1)
> Running idividual test files
should work now as well (I did not test all of them, though).
Günter
_______________________________________________
Docutils-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop
Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.