[docutils:patches] #190 Move to native `unittest`

Adam Turner via Docutils-develop <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.docutils.devel
Message-ID </p/docutils/patches/190/b873b342570340abb2f48a11ebbb8d092048b6ba.patches@docutils.p.sourceforge.net>
- **status**: open-accepted --> closed-accepted



---

** [patches:#190] Move to native `unittest`**

**Status:** closed-accepted
**Group:** None
**Created:** Thu Jan 20, 2022 01:10 AM UTC by Adam  Turner
**Last Updated:** Wed Nov 30, 2022 01:00 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody


From FR81 https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/feature-requests/81/#fc55/3d8d by Günter Milde

> I had a quick look and the work looks promising, so yes, I would like to
> give it a try.
> 
> What is the effect on the test time and on the output if there are, e.g.,
> differences between output and expected in functional tests?
> 
> To avoid wasted work (and the sunken-cost fallacy), I propose to split
> the project into smaller changesets (of 1 to ca. 7 commits) which we can
> discuss and adapt before pushing to origin/master and then move to the
> next step.
> I expect some rounds of discussion per step, so there is no
> need to invest heavily in polishing in the first round.
> A link to a patch that I can apply with git am -3 to a local branch
> would be fine.
> The discussion could move to docutils-develop or a new ticket,
> whatever you prefer.

This is the proposed tracking issue for moving to native unittest

A


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/patches/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/admin/patches/options.  Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.