Re: Release 0.20

Adam Turner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.docutils.devel
Message-ID <LO3P123MB2681087800B2710AC9C946FDC2919@LO3P123MB2681.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Dear Günter,

> While I favour keeping "auto_encode" over a seprate `publish_bytes()`
> function, I left the decision about the end state of this transition open...

A decision to make later, and one that doesn't block the 0.20 release!

> This will become easier with type annotations in the source.

> (How about starting with annotating "core.py". I only postponed this because
> I don't know whether a partially type-hinted module will interfere with the
> present 3rd-party type hint stubs.)

I have a patch for adding type hints to Docutils, but wanted to wait
until releasing Docutils 0.20 so as not to add major new changes to
the repository.

>> If you have time, perhaps you could commit your patch (or the latest
>> version thereof), and we could make progress from there? As far as I
>> can tell, the only unresolved point at the moment ahead of releasing
>> Docutils 0.20 is the future of ``publish_bytes``.

> This is now [r9336].
> A patch removing `publish_bytes` waits in a branch in my local Git repo.

I think to un-block the release we should apply the patch removing
``publish_bytes``.

Thanks,
Adam
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.