[docutils:feature-requests] #29 include directive and parsed literals

"Günter Milde" via Docutils-develop <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.docutils.devel
Message-ID </p/docutils/feature-requests/29/add5bf688e42756c839671ee86889376e6c39db6.feature-requests@docutils.p.sourceforge.net>
- **status**: open --> closed-invalid
- **Comment**:

The OP did not specify unambiguously what the desired behaviour would be and did not follow up for more than 10 years.
There has not been other requests for a "parsed-literal" include option.



---

**[feature-requests:#29] include directive and parsed literals**

**Status:** closed-invalid
**Group:** Default
**Created:** Fri Aug 31, 2012 06:49 PM UTC by Mike Solomon
**Last Updated:** Wed Mar 11, 2015 03:09 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody


With Docutils >= 0.9, it is impossible to include HTML files \(without parsing of rst-inline-markup in the HTML file\) with the "include" directive::

.. include:: test.html
:code: HTML

It would be nice to have a new option for the include directive that allowed one to pass the content of the included file to a "parsed literal" block. Something like:

.. include:: test.html
:parsed-literal: HTML



---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/feature-requests/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/admin/feature-requests/options.  Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.