Re: [docutils:feature-requests] Re: #72 rst2man: Show reference targets
engelbert gruber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHnbgBN0qY+V8XVzk17Gk5Cdz4V60FnHCxPuqtZF7ohZWged4A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 05:38, G. Branden Robinson < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Engelbert, > > At 2023-08-14T10:41:58+0200, engelbert gruber wrote: > > On man 7 man (AFAIR) is a list of safe statements .sp asf > > Yes. The man(7) page from the Linux man-pages project does have a list > of "safe" formatter requests. Long story short, the current Linux > man-pages maintainer would like to withdraw the page and has invited me > to submit (the equivalent of) a merge request to do so.[1] mandoc > maintainer Ingo Schwarze and I take a pretty different approach to the > problem; we agree that minimal use of formatter requests, and sticking > to the existing sets of package macros (plus a few escape sequences) is > the most reliable route to portable man page rendering. > > > That "minimal" approach also means that people writing man(7) documents > or tools to generate them have to master much less material. > > > > For those whose systems don't have 1.23.0 installed yet, the > groff_man_style(7) document can be read in PDF; go to page 253. > > https://www.gnu.org/software/groff/manual/groff-man-pages.pdf did put it on my list :-) > > > [1] "I want to kill that page" > take him by his word submit a minimal page pointing to the macros actually in my understanding man 7 man should be the man macros groff_man or man_roff or man _groff should container formatter requests cheers > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/[email protected]/T/#m124e9719a24560c8ed5526e7464d4a4c311008a7 > _______________________________________________ > Docutils-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop > > Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list. >