Re: suggestion for better manpage image handling

fair enough

1. change waring to info
2. reformat
3. what if there is no alt-text ? if the image-filename is not in output,
no one knows there could be something

  this could be a feature or annoying

cheers


On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 00:32, Guenter Milde via Docutils-develop <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Engelbert, dear Docutils developers,
>
> with man pages usually presented on a terminal, it is no surprise that
> the "manpage" writer does not support images. However, the current
> behavior around this limitation may, IMO, be iproved.
>
> If the image has an "alt" attribute, use its value *instead of* the
> filename.
> Example::
>
>   text
>
>   .. image:: gibsnich.png
>      :alt: an image of something
>
>   more text
>
> With ``rst2man foo.rst > foo.roff`` I get a ::
>
>   (WARNING/2) "image" not supported
>
> and `man ./foo.roff` shows::
>
>
>   ()
>   ()
>
>   Name
>           - text [image: an image of something/gibsnich.png]
>
>          more text
>
> I would prefer an (INFO/1) instead of a warning and ::
>
>   ()
>   ()
>
>   Name
>          text
>
>              an image of something
>
>          more text
>
>
>
> For images without an :alt: attribute, the warning should be kept
> but amended with something in the line of
>
>    (WARNING/2) "image" not supported by "manpage" writer.
>    Please provide an "alt" attribute with textual replacement.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Günter
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Docutils-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop
>
> Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.
>