[PATCH 0/2] Rebase of the --latex-footenotes patch

Matěj Cepl <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:52:07 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.text.docutils.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I have used rST for reconstruction of the ancient theological
text and with the scholarly version I got plenty of footnotes
(which I would like to print on the bottom of the page with
per-page numbering) [1], and I found to my unpleasant surprise
that rst2xetex doesn’t produce correct LaTeX footnotes, but
something weird, which certainly cannot be controlled by the
standard LaTeX tools.

I have found this patch, and decided to at least rebase it
against the current master branch. I needed to fix tests, but
otherwise the test suite now seems to pass.

What do you think?

Best,

Matěj

[1] https://git.sr.ht/~mcepl/justin_susil/tree/master/item/p_just_2_apol.rst

John Thorvald Wodder II (1):
  An implementation of --latex-footnotes

Matěj Cepl (1):
  Fix tests to work with --latex-footnotes option.

 docutils/docutils/writers/latex2e/__init__.py |  93 +++--
 docutils/test/data/help/rst2latex.rst         |   3 +-
 docutils/test/test_writers/test_latex2e.py    | 322 +++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

-- 
2.50.1



_______________________________________________
Docutils-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop

Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.