Re: docutils prerelease 0.19b1
Guenter Milde via Docutils-develop <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Adam, On 2022-06-22, Adam Turner wrote: >> - testing with Sphinx and other third party tools >> * contact concerned developers/maintainers Github tickets? > Speaking in my co-maintainer of Sphinx role, Sphinx passes all tests > with r9096 This is good news. > although I still need to do visual testing, I will at > the weekend. I will also respond to the other questions later on in the > week. Another idea would be opening tickets at major contributing projects (MyST, furo or other CSS schemes, ...) and ask for testing with Docutils 0.19b there. Could you also have a look, if there are DeprecationWarnings when compiling a project? I could successfully compile "PyLit" documentation with sphinx-build 3.4.3 (from Debian/stable) and Docutils 0.19b (with warnings because of the "meta" element changes, but the result looks fine (although not polished yet, see https://milde.codeberg.page/PyLit/). Günter _______________________________________________ Docutils-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.