Re: 2015: reStructuredText implementations in other programming languages?

StackOverflow and all the other StackExchange sites use Markdown heavily. I
think the plethora of Markdown implementations in different languages has
helped its adoption.

There's also VST, an implementation of reStructuredText in VimL, Vim's
native extension language. I used it for a year or so and gave the author
feedback, but it was never great.
https://github.com/vim-scripts/VST/blob/master/doc2/vst.txt

-- 
/George V. Reilly  [email protected]  Twitter: @georgevreilly
*http://georgevreilly.github.io/ <http://georgevreilly.github.io/>*

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Kevin Horn <[email protected]> wrote:

> @Skip
>
> IMO, RestructuredText and Markdown fill different niches.  Markdown really
> targets HTML output and is quite limited when talking about other output
> formats.  This is mainly because it only supports a limited group of
> document elements.  If you need something outside this set of elements, the
> Markdown way of handling this is to insert raw html.  This really makes
> markdown only suitable for (relatively) simple documents or documents that
> will be turned into HTML.
>
> RestructuredText tries much harder to support whatever type of document
> element you happen to need, and if one isn't supported, it has built in
> extension mechanisms (custom directives/roles) which you can use.  This
> allows it to be much more useful if you want to support non-HTML output
> formats.
>
> There's room for both in the ecosystem, as they do different things
> (though there is some overlap).
>
> As far as Markdown taking over, I would say that both have experienced
> quite a bit of growth in the last few years, Markdown mostly being used for
> simple documents, and HTML fragments (thinking comments here), and
> RestructuredText getting a lot of use and exposure via Sphinx (which is
> used for lots of projects even outside the Python community).
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Skip Montanaro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hasn't Markdown kind of taken over the marked-up-text world these days?
>> Or is that just how it appears since that's what Github supports?
>>
>> Skip
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
>> exercises
>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>> event?utm_
>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>> _______________________________________________
>> Docutils-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-users
>>
>> Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> Kevin Horn
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
> exercises
> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
> event?utm_
> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
> _______________________________________________
> Docutils-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-users
>
> Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF