Re: HTML writer: initial EOL after <pre>

Guenter Milde <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.docutils.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2016-08-14, Alan G. Isaac wrote:
>> On 2016-08-11, Alan Isaac wrote:
>>> 3. If styling is not a solution, should PRE elements be written
>>> with content following immediately (rather than with
>>> an initial EOL)?


> On 8/13/2016 6:29 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:>
>> I think so. This is what the "html5" writer does.


> I found this explanation:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17722951/difference-in-display-between-html-and-xhtml
> It seems from this explanation that the XHTML writers
> should not write an extra EOL immediately after a PRE tag,
> but it should not matter for HTML 5.

Yes. However, to be on the safe side, the "html5-plain" writer writes
"polyglott" HTML that is also valid XML.

Günter


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Docutils-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-users

Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.