Re: Inline markup status

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:50:12 +0200
Martin Koutecký <[email protected]> wrote:

> For my purposes, it would suffice if we could have one level of nested
> inline markup: there are substitution references which serve for
> deduplication, but some occurrences of the strings are emphasized
> while other are not -- this is where I need nesting.

Just to add that I'd very happy with that as well!

At the moment I'm considering whether to use rst or asciidoc(tor) markup for
all my writings which includes study notes, web content (via
static-site-generator), articles, slide-show presentations...up to working on
full-fledged book(s).

Although rst has strange mark for some things, it's still vwery powerful and
the tooling is much lighter - recently heard that reference implementation for
Asciidoc(tor)'s spec is going to be implemented in Java which does not sound
too great for me not liking to use Java in general...


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
The senses, the mind and the intelligence are the sitting places
of this lust. Through them lust covers the real knowledge of the
living entity and bewilders him.




_______________________________________________
Docutils-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-users

Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.