query about literal inclusion with :literal: and :code:
Alan <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:45:21 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docutils.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOShCKxq9VNDsJ3wA-W-q6S=nbU-cB6Jr-k7qStgq0WZE-OfqQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============1594953296394823349== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008786f6063e6610ad" --0000000000008786f6063e6610ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I am happy that if I include code specifying :literal: as well as using :code: to specify the language that this suppresses the parsing for syntax highlighting, which I definitely do not want in this case. But it seems to me that I should still get the `code` and programming language classes set on the pre element and also to have the inclusion wrapped in a `code` element. Currently, the fact that I set :code: is apparently ignored (by the rst2html5 writer). Thanks for considering this viewpoint, Alan Isaac --0000000000008786f6063e6610ad Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">I am happy that if I include code specifying :literal: as = well as using :code: to specify the language that this suppresses the parsi= ng for syntax highlighting, which I definitely do not want in this case. Bu= t it seems to me that I should still get the `code` and programming languag= e classes set on the pre element and also to have the inclusion wrapped in = a `code` element. Currently, the fact that I set :code: is apparently ignor= ed (by the rst2html5 writer).<div><br></div><div>Thanks=C2=A0for considerin= g this viewpoint,</div><div>Alan Isaac</div></div> --0000000000008786f6063e6610ad-- --===============1594953296394823349== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============1594953296394823349== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline