thoughts on replacing qtools with stl ?
Adrian M Negreanu <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:09:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.doxygen.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGV5d_006-4S6Na+gbOg7-_8raQfVM0xNkQcpkAhoSn3jQ=C=A@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, I discovered QList to be pretty slow compared to std::list. I did the test in a rough way by just iterating g_inputFiles in doxygen.cpp:parseFiles(). Ofc, after the call site of parseFiles() I exited doxygen thus no documentation was generated. The times obtained were 29seconds using StringList vs. 2seconds using std::list<QCString>. The sources on which I ran doxygen consisted of libva/libdrm/mesa-library which amounts to a few thousands of files. Now, considering that QList is used in other places, is it sane to also use std::list instead of QList ? thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612