Options for scala support

--===============7231712869203776141==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b09a409efb005554cdfb6"

--001a114b09a409efb005554cdfb6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I would like to use doxygen xml output to integrate comment documentation
into other tools. I love that doxygen supports multiple languages but I
would need Scala support in addition to C/C++, Java, C# and Python.

1) Has anyone tried any of the FAQ options
<https://www.stack.nl/%7Edimitri/doxygen/manual/faq.html#faq_pgm_X> to
support Scala? If so, how did it go and what's the best approach?

2) I have considered writing a scaladoc generator that generates doxygen
xml output so I can use the scaladoc -doc-generator option instead doxygen
to parse scala and get the same xml output.

If I did write this scaladoc generator it would be really cool if doxygen
could use it's own xml output format as input as a kind of backward way to
use doxygen on languages like Scala that might have a complex syntax which
makes "tweaking" the doxygen parser to support it a difficult option. Is
using doxygen xml output as doxygen input a possibility?

Best Regards
-- 
Ryan

--001a114b09a409efb005554cdfb6
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I would like to use doxygen xml output to integrate c=
omment documentation into other tools. I love that doxygen supports multipl=
e languages but I would need Scala support in addition to C/C++, Java, C# a=
nd Python.<br><br></div><div>1) Has anyone tried <a href=3D"https://www.sta=
ck.nl/%7Edimitri/doxygen/manual/faq.html#faq_pgm_X">any of the FAQ options<=
/a> to support Scala? If so, how did it go and what&#39;s the best approach=
?<br><br></div><div>2) I have considered writing a scaladoc generator that =
generates doxygen xml output so I can use the scaladoc -doc-generator optio=
n instead doxygen to parse scala and get the same xml output.<br><br></div>=
<div>If I did write this scaladoc generator it would be really cool if doxy=
gen could use it&#39;s own xml output format as input as a kind of backward=
 way to use doxygen on languages like Scala that might have a complex synta=
x which makes &quot;tweaking&quot; the doxygen parser to support it a diffi=
cult option. Is using doxygen xml output as doxygen input a possibility?<br=
 clear=3D"all"></div><div><div><br></div><div>Best Regards<br></div><div>--=
 <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">Ryan<br><br></div></di=
v>
</div></div></div>

--001a114b09a409efb005554cdfb6--


--===============7231712869203776141==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
--===============7231712869203776141==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Doxygen-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-develop

--===============7231712869203776141==--