Re: [PATCH] [2/2] prototype mistaken as class constructor: recognize typedef names

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:13:26PM -0500, Kevin McBride wrote:
> It's a good thing that you are submitting patches to the developer list,
> and we appreciate you submitting your patches.  However, we prefer all
> bugs to be filed within the bugzilla, even if you have the patches to
> fix the bugs.

Okay.  I've submitted them as bugs 324565, 324566, and 324568.


BTW: On this page:

  http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/trouble.html#bug_reports

it says "please use PATCH as a keyword in the bug report", but note that:

  - The Bugzilla "new patch" forms never ask you for keywords, which
    was confusing at first.

  - If you view the bug after submitting it, there is a keywords field.
    But when I try to put PATCH in there, Bugzilla complains that "PATCH"
    is not a valid keyword.  I notice that if I get Bugzilla to list all
    valid keywords, "PATCH" is not listed, but some of the keyword
    descriptions mention it.  So I'm guessing that it used to be a valid
    keyword but was later deprecated.

                                                  -Dave Dodge


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click