Re: Re: [Refdb-users] ANN: RefDB RPM packages pulled, packagers wanted
Markus Hoenicka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.refdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Nebauer <[email protected]> was heard to say: > There is one further problem: the 'dos2unix' script supplied with refdb > is going to conflict with an executable of the same name supplied by the > 'sysutils' package (actually, '/usr/bin/dos2unix' is a symlink to > '/usr/bin/fromdos'). It was never a problem until now since refdb > installed to '/usr/local/bin' while the sysutils version lives in > '/usr/bin'. Of course, since debian policy requires the debian version > of refdb to install its scripts/binary files to '/usr/bin', the two > files now clash. > > There are a number of possible solutions: > 1. I can always remove the 'dos2unix' and 'dos2unix.in' files and > manually strip out any related plumbing in the relevant make files, > 2. The build system could check the OS and not install the file if it > detects a debian OS, or > 3. Rename the script. > The cleanest way is to rename the script. I guess there are quite a few implementations of this kind of tool out there, all with the same name. Putting a 'refdb_' in front of the filename should be all it takes to avoid conflicts. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [email protected] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click