Re: CVS vs. Subversion

I've never used CVS so I can't compare it to SVN, but I am really happy
with SVN which I use all the time.

-d

On Sat, 2006-01-04 at 22:20 +0200, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't know how many RefDB users ever try to build from CVS. I guess
> there are some, and this message is relevant to those as well as to
> all developers.
> 
> SourceForge has ongoing problems with their CVS servers. This
> currently prevents me from finishing the next prerelease and from
> adding a new RefDB application (soon to be announced). The Subversion
> servers seem to work ok. It is up to the project admin (read: up to
> me) to migrate the CVS repository to Subversion. I'm not in a hurry to
> do this, and I'd like to get your opinions first. Would the move to
> Subversion break anything? I'm afraid the refdb-cvs scripts would need
> an overhaul. Let me know what you think.
> 
> If you don't know Subversion yet, just go to
> 
> http://subversion.tigris.org/
> 
> to read more about this CVS replacement.
> 
> regards,
> Markus
> 
> 
-- 
Daniel Paul O'Donnell
Associate Professor and Acting Chair
Director, Digital Medievalist Project
<http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>
Department of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Canada

Vox +1 403 329-2377
Fax +1 403 382-7191

:@caedmon/ubuntu




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642