[Refdb-devel] Re: CVS vs. Subversion
"Markus Hoenicka" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.refdb.general,gmane.text.refdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I gather from this feedback that no one has to stick with CVS. I'll go ahead and migrate the CVS repository to Subversion in the near future. Before I do this, I'd like to clean up the repository a bit. Most important, I'd like to fold back the stable branch to the trunk as the latter has turned out to be sort of a dead end. But in order to do this cleanup, and in order to check my local changes I'll have to wait until the SourceForge CVS service online again. I'll let you know when the migration is done. regards, Markus David Mundie writes: > I've used both and think you should immediately switch to Subversion > and never look back. > > - dam > > On 2006-Apr-01, at 17:00, Daniel O'Donnell wrote: > > > I've never used CVS so I can't compare it to SVN, but I am really > > happy > > with SVN which I use all the time. > > -- Markus Hoenicka [email protected] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642