Re: latex bibliographies with multiple databases
Damien Jade Duff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.refdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gidday
As a novice latex user it seems okay; I can't envisage any difficulties.
Probably jumping the gun a bit here, but I'd like to see the following
kind of latex markup reproduced (not stripped entirely):
BIBTEX:
TITLE = {Why {AM} and {EURISKO} appear to work},
Current RIS:
TI - Why {AM} and {EURISKO} appear to work
Current RISX:
<title type="full">Why {AM} and {EURISKO} appear to work</title>
The reason is that bibtex will capitalise your bibliography according to
the current bibliography style (generally with a single leading
capital), and you need to inform bibtex that certain passages are to be
formatted verbatim.
Other than that, I can't envisage the need for keeping latex markup -
I've been manually stripping everything else. I enter most of my
references using risx (I use bibtex and RIS where provided but usually
edit them manually before submitting them to RefDB), and I don't appear
to have any entites coming back (probably because I don't know how to
use entities).
Except I think entities are used in some of the URLs - I don't know if
they're necessary or not, they're just there.
Peace
Damien
David Nebauer wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
>
>>I take from this discussion:
>>
>>1) Use a bib2ris post-processing script (or rewrite bib2ris to contain such
>>code) which strips markup like boldface, superscript etc. and translates
>>foreign characters entered as LaTeX constructs to their Unicode equivalents.
>>
>>2) Modify the code to prevent XML entities to show up in LaTeX output.
>>
>>3) Add code to escape the LaTeX command characters in the LaTeX output.
>>
>>The second point is a bit tricky. References imported from RIS usually do not
>>contain entities, but references imported from risx are likely to do. Either I
>>convert these entities during import, or I remove them during LaTeX export. The
>>former seems cleaner to me, and I think this is what you had in mind.
>
>
> Yes, in my view the storage format is Unicode without markup:
>
>
> BibTeX ------- ---------> DocBook
> | |
> | |
> RIS ---------+--> STORAGE ----
> | (Unicode) |
> | |
> RISX --------- ---------> LaTeX
>
>
>
> Whatever the input format, all references end up in the same storage
> format (Unicode sans markup). This would require stripping out XML
> entities and LaTeX markup. With luck you can use existing tools to do
> this. The stored references can then be output in either DocBook- or
> LaTeX-compatible format. This seems to be to be an elegant way of
> dealing with the mishmash of input and output formats.
>
> Regards,
> David.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Refdb-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/refdb-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642