Re: latex bibliographies with multiple databases

Damien Jade Duff <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.refdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Gidday

As a novice latex user it seems okay; I can't envisage any difficulties.

Probably jumping the gun a bit here, but I'd like to see the following 
kind of latex markup reproduced (not stripped entirely):

BIBTEX:
   TITLE = {Why {AM} and {EURISKO} appear to work},

Current RIS:
TI  - Why {AM} and {EURISKO} appear to work

Current RISX:
       <title type="full">Why {AM} and {EURISKO} appear to work</title>

The reason is that bibtex will capitalise your bibliography according to 
the current bibliography style (generally with a single leading 
capital), and you need to inform bibtex that certain passages are to be 
formatted verbatim.

Other than that, I can't envisage the need for keeping latex markup - 
I've been manually stripping everything else. I enter most of my 
references using risx (I use bibtex and RIS where provided but usually 
edit them manually before submitting them to RefDB), and I don't appear 
to have any entites coming back (probably because I don't know how to 
use entities).
Except I think entities are used in some of the URLs - I don't know if 
they're necessary or not, they're just there.

Peace
Damien

David Nebauer wrote:
> Hi Markus,
> 
> 
>>I take from this discussion:
>>
>>1) Use a bib2ris post-processing script (or rewrite bib2ris to contain such
>>code) which strips markup like boldface, superscript etc. and translates
>>foreign characters entered as LaTeX constructs to their Unicode equivalents.
>>
>>2) Modify the code to prevent XML entities to show up in LaTeX output.
>>
>>3) Add code to escape the LaTeX command characters in the LaTeX output.
>>
>>The second point is a bit tricky. References imported from RIS usually do not
>>contain entities, but references imported from risx are likely to do. Either I
>>convert these entities during import, or I remove them during LaTeX export. The
>>former seems cleaner to me, and I think this is what you had in mind.
> 
> 
> Yes, in my view the storage format is Unicode without markup:
> 
> 
> BibTeX -------               ---------> DocBook
>              |               |
>              |               |
> RIS ---------+--> STORAGE ----
>              |   (Unicode)   |
>              |               |
> RISX ---------               ---------> LaTeX
> 
> 
> 
> Whatever the input format, all references end up in the same storage 
> format (Unicode sans markup).  This would require stripping out XML 
> entities and LaTeX markup.  With luck you can use existing tools to do 
> this.  The stored references can then be output in either DocBook- or 
> LaTeX-compatible format.  This seems to be to be an elegant way of 
> dealing with the mishmash of input and output formats.
> 
> Regards,
> David.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Refdb-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/refdb-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.