Re: latex bibliographies with multiple databases
David Nebauer <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:10:22 +0930
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.refdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Markus, Markus Hoenicka wrote: > Actually we can still use ISO-8859-1 or whatever as the RIS input > format as refdbd internally converts it to UTF-8 if the database uses > this encoding. Forcing UTF-8 for RIS data actually makes only sense if > people use both bibtex and RIS data. The advantage of making UTF-8 the default encoding at each step in the life cycle is you don't have to remember when to specify UTF-8 encoding and when not to. Still, the most important thing is making sure to document clearly what the default encoding is at each step so the user knows what is happening. Regards, David. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV