[ refdb-Bugs-1545810 ] Some permissions are incorrect in the archive

"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:36:49 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.text.refdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bugs item #1545810, was opened at 2006-08-24 10:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhoenicka
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=385991&aid=1545810&group_id=26091

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: refdbd
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: steletch (steletch)
Assigned to: Markus Hoenicka (mhoenicka)
Summary: Some permissions are incorrect in the archive

Initial Comment:
-rwxr-xr-x  1 steletch mig  1403 avr 14 00:07 AUTHORS*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 steletch mig 29746 avr 14 00:07 COPYING*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 steletch mig  2964 jun 25 23:38 INSTALL*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 steletch mig 10280 avr 14 00:07 missing*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 steletch mig 30690 jun 25 15:39 NEWS*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 steletch mig  8876 mai 26 15:47 README*
-rw-r--r--  1 steletch mig 12660 mai 27 23:18 UPGRADING

All of these should be 644 instead of 755 (no
executable bit ...) since they are only texty files.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Markus Hoenicka (mhoenicka)
Date: 2006-08-28 12:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85809

Turns out that Subversion treats the executable bit
specially for the sake of interoperatibility between Unixes
and Windows. I've now used the svn propdel command. This
apparently fixed the problem. Please try revision 146.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Markus Hoenicka (mhoenicka)
Date: 2006-08-28 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85809

I swear I did! Please have a look at the checkins (revision
133) right here:

http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/refdb/refdb/trunk/

I'm afraid that Subversion plays a trick on me. Apparently
checking in a file with altered permissions does not change
the permissions on the server. If anyone has a clue, please
let me know.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: steletch (steletch)
Date: 2006-08-28 10:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1129476

you have probably forgotten to commit the changes, in the
0.8.9-pre3 prerelease, the permissions are not fixed ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Markus Hoenicka (mhoenicka)
Date: 2006-08-24 21:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85809

I've changed the permissions of the mentioned files to
non-executable except for "missing" which is a shell script


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=385991&aid=1545810&group_id=26091

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642