Re: DB_VERSION redux
Markus Hoenicka <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:26:10 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.refdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Nebauer <[email protected]> was heard to say: > I ran the server in standalone mode to capture log output and, lo and > behold, the version file updated on the first database read. No idea > why earlier attempts failed. > Come to think of it, the version file will not be updated if you run refdbd -a. This will update the main database if necessary, but the version file gets updated only as soon as refdbd forks to handle a client request. I probably ran refdbd -s after each refdbd -a run to see whether refdbd starts up correctly. Therefore I always saw the version file being updated. Would it be hard to change your install scripts and get rid of DB_VERSION in favour of a refdbd -c call? I'd suggest to drop DB_VERSION then. I could also make the refdbd -c output easier to parse. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [email protected] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV