Re: ALL fields
Markus Hoenicka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.refdb.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Z F <[email protected]> was heard to say: > If one wants to get all fields then, it appears that refdbc -F switch > requires "all" option instead of "ALL" which is stated in the > documentation. It might be that refdbc should not be case sensitive, > but it is. Am I correct? > Not quite. The server checks for the string "ALL", so the argument is case sensitive. "all" seems to work better in your experiments due to a bug that I just discovered. For some reasons, retrieving extended notes along with a reference ceased to work. For the time being you should avoid using "ALL" and list the additional fields explicitly. To reproduce the problem, try getref :ID:=1 -s ALL This will fail, just like getref :ID:=1 -s NX whereas getref :ID:=1 -s URL1L2L3L4N1N2AVRP works ok. I'll have to find out what's going wrong with the extended notes. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [email protected] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642