Re: mandatory RIS fields

> 
> JF  - Journal of Irreproducible Results
> JO  - J.Irrep.Res.
> 
> then the first one (and all other datasets that specify either of
> these names) will show both the JF and the JO entry when retrieving
> it
> again. RefDB keeps the journal name synonyms in a separate table and
> retrieves whichever synonyms are available for a particular
> periodical. This is a feature, not a bug. There is actually a command
> available (refdba:updatejo) to edit the synonyms.

Oh, so you are saying I made a mistake somewhere and one of the
references contained both fields:

JF  - Journal of Irreproducible Results
JO  - I.Can't.Do.It

and therefore, all future references to "I.Can't.Do.It" were
accossiated
with the "Journal of Irreproducible Results". Ok, I will check if
this is what had happened.

Thanks

Lazar

PS in refdb 0.9.6-pre3, I do not see updatejo neither in refdba nor in
refdbc. Was it introduced later? It is a useful command.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642