Re: RefDB and Jurabib

Markus Hoenicka <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:36:32 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.text.refdb.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jeremy,

Quoting Jeremy Malcolm <[email protected]>:

> Does anyone think it would be a good idea, and if so how feasible would
> it be, to integrate support for the additional BibTeX fields used by
> Jurabib into RefDB?
>

What additional fields do you precisely need? Right now I'm not  
exactly sure whether RefDB does not *store* these values at all, or  
whether it does not *export* them properly to bibtex.

>
> [0] Basically it's as simple as having footnotes that include all
>      the same information as the bibliography entries.  See the thread
>      at
> http://sf.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=d2a04bd25ec20800d04f2548214b0fbe%40Malcolm.id.au
>

I believe the problem is quite different now from what it was back  
then. If you cut out DocBook from your workflow, all that remains for  
RefDB to do is to export the available data properly as bibtex. There  
is essentially no formatting involved, except maybe providing the full  
or abbreviated names of journals. I'll be happy to extend RefDB's  
capabilities if you can list exactly how the bibtex output needs to  
change. I'd greatly appreciate if you could send some example data how  
that output ought to look like.

regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka
[email protected]
(Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka")
http://www.mhoenicka.de


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV