Re: TEI next
Conal Tuohy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAErBQuQnDFXyR7oKH=WOi0p63SaLzJLy1Dp2ei+awt8mgwH4LQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I agree that TEI needs better integration with IIIF. In a recent discussion on Facebook around IIIF and TEI, I suggested that a tool for generating TEI from IIIF would also be useful. If we had tools for converting in both directions; i.e. IIIF→TEI and TEI→IIIF, it would allow TEI-oriented tools to be inserted into the existing IIIF stack, allowing TEI processing software written in XSLT and XQuery, etc, to be used to enhance existing IIIF client-server systems. Another thing in its favour would be the wonderful acronym TEIIIIF. On 28 September 2016 at 02:03, MLH <[email protected]> wrote: > The increasing importance of IIIF as a way of delivering digitised content > raises particular questions about TEI/JSON tools. A tool to generate an > IIIF manifest from a TEI manuscript description could greatly improve the > quality of existing manifests (many of which are just lists of image > sequences with little or not information about manuscript contents etc) and > would support the continuing relevance of TEI > > Matthew > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> > -- Conal Tuohy http://conaltuohy.com/ @conal_tuohy +61-466-324297