Re: Repeat <additions>

Dear Peter,

thanks for your reference to <list>. I think we will try it. If it does 
not work, I will think about a feature request. But currently I do not 
know what I really would request for:

1. Make <additions> repeatable. I guess I see the point why 
model.physDescPart is not repeatable in the cases of the its other 
members.
2. Make <additions> a child of itself. Thus, model.physDescPart in 
<physDesc> could stay as it is. Maybe I want not to speak about groups 
of additions but only about one addition.
3. In that case an element <additon> as child of <additions> would be 
nice.

But indeed, at the moment I think that none of this is really necessary 
if <list> does what we want. However, I think that the example in the 
guidelines should be commented.

Best,
Philipp


Am 2016-10-20 09:49, schrieb Peter Stadler:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> good catch! The examples are somewhat misleading in suggesting they
> actually form *one* example within <physDesc>. The same issue is
> repeated with <musicNotation>, btw.
> I looked a little bit into older releases of the Guidelines and yes,
> the schema and the prose always constrained <physDesc> to a sequence
> where no member of the sequence is repeatable.
> So, I’d say that issue is a good candidate for a bug report on
> https://github.com/TEIC/TEI to separate those examples.
> Second, maybe your issue with several types of additions could be
> handled with a <list> inside <additions> (see the last example at
> http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/MS.html#mspham)?
> 
> Best
> Peter
> 
>> Am 19.10.2016 um 19:26 schrieb Philipp Vanscheidt 
>> <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> Dear list,
>> 
>> there is an example in the guidelines in which the <additions> element 
>> is repeated several times:
>> 
>> http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/MS.html#mspham
>> 
>> There is only one element allowing <additions>, namely <physDesc>. But 
>> the content model of this element (and tei_all) tell(s) me that 
>> "additions?" is expected and <additions> therefore not repeatable. I 
>> would like to repeat it for different types of additions or different 
>> hands if there is now other way that should be preferred to do this.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Philipp
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Sprach- und 
>> Literaturwissenschaft
>> Dolivostraße 15, 64293 Darmstadt
>> Tel.: 06151/1657405
>> [email protected]

-- 
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Sprach- und 
Literaturwissenschaft
Dolivostraße 15, 64293 Darmstadt
Tel.: 06151/1657405
[email protected]