Re: encoding bibliographical references to numbered entries
Stefan Dumont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi James, hi Matthew, thanks for the clarification, because this was new to me! Perhaps we should adjust the note in the <biblScope> reference? Right now, it seems for me, that the note is (regarding the difference to <citedRange>) a little bit missunderstandig: "When a single page is being cited, use the @from and @to attributes with an identical value. When no clear endpoint is provided, the @from attribute should be used without @to. For example, if the citation has ‘p. 3ff’ as a page reference." Perhaps we could make also a reference to the element <citedRange>? Best regards, Stefan Am 13.12.2016 um 12:19 schrieb James Cummings: > On 13/12/16 11:09, MLH wrote: >> >> Thanks James et al. I should have noticed that they were only >> suggested values! 'entry' makes sense to me in this case although it >> would be interesting to hear what other people have done. >> >> >> re. Elisa's suggested about <biblScope>: my impression was that >> <biblScope> and <citedRange> had rather different functions, the first >> describing the pages (or whatever) occupied by a whole cited work >> (e.g. chapter in a book), and the second describing the pages cited >> from that work in a given reference. For example: >> >> A. N. Other, "Example book section", in /Example Book/, <biblScope>pp. >> 123-234</biblScope>, at <citedRange>pp. 125-6</citedRange> >> > > Hi Matthew, > > You are correct in your understanding. Some projects use biblScope where > they should use citedRange because citedRange is a more recent addition > to the TEI. It was first added in TEI P5 version 2.3.0 > http://www.tei-c.org/Vault/P5/2.3.0/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-citedRange.html > in January 2013. Before this, biblScope sometimes did double duty to > cope with cited ranges as well in some projects. > > (Just some history so people are reminded how much the TEI is a > developing, community-based standard.) > > Those wanting this to be a suggested value... I've added an issue here > on github: > https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1555 > feel free to add your voice, clarifications, or objections there. > > -James > > -- Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften TELOTA-Arbeitsgruppe Jägerstraße 22/23 10117 Berlin Tel.: 030 / 20370 -684 [email protected] www.bbaw.de/telota