Re: Principal or Editor?
Martin Mueller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Is there any activity that is “more scholarly” than “mere editing”, if one understands editing—as one should—as the most fundamental of scholarly activities? Take away editing and what have you got? On 1/5/17, 6:18 AM, "TEI (Text Encoding Initiative) public discussion list on behalf of Tryon, Julia" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: I prefer <principal> since one is often doing more scholarly work than mere editing. Julia R. Tryon Assistant Professor Commons Librarian for Research & Education Phillips Memorial Library + Commons Providence College 1 Cunningham Square Providence, RI 02918 [email protected] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__works.bepress.com_julia-5Ftryon_&d=CwIGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=rG8zxOdssqSzDRz4x1GLlmLOW60xyVXydxwnJZpkxbk&m=MNel62KSO9AcHNodpx2H5PTFYlZbEKy2USSfubrI_Lc&s=yJrGAOKNAWDzyNN04cPTo4le3sBxVdnAXNv_NAm-UtI&e= 401-865-1990 On 1/4/17, 7:34 PM, "TEI (Text Encoding Initiative) public discussion list on behalf of Marjorie Burghart" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Dear all, > >What is your practice for supplying the name of the scholar who made a critical edition, in the TEI Header: do you prefer <editor>, or <principal>? Reading the Guidelines, I have trouble deciding which is the more appropriate. > >Best, >Marjorie