Re: Dictionaries, practical question
Toma Tasovac <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
One option would be TLex http://tshwanedje.com/tshwanelex/ <http://tshwanedje.com/tshwanelex/> There are others out there, of course. What your colleague is looking for is called a Dictionary Writing System (DWS). All best, Toma > 11 янв. 2017 г., в 16:37, Paul Schaffner <[email protected]> написал(а): > > Hi all, this is not strictly TEI, as you'll see, but I suspect there are > a number of lexicographers here. I was asked yesterday by someone > compiling a Latin dictionary if there was a standard (perhaps > database-type) piece of application software in which to compile, edit, > and search it. He is (sigh) using Microsoft Word at the moment, and has > rejected the usual filemaker-type databases as not sufficiently > supportive of word-processor-type formatting (multiple languages and > fonts, etc.) I of course pointed out that the chief desideratum for > future functionality was to distinguish unambiguously between different > structurally distinct pieces of each entry; that XML was a good vehicle > for recording the sort of mixture of fielded, normalized and free-form > text typical of dictionaries; that XML could be entered, searched, and > edited in any number of applications, from Access forms to simple text > editors; and that TEI did have a functional dictionaries module which > was worth considering. I am investigating further as to what he actually > hopes to do with the data, which makes a big difference. > > But in the meantime: is there in fact a popular software choice amongst > working lexicographers? (To the extent that anything used by > lexicographers could be called 'popular'!) > > pfs > > -- > Paul Schaffner Digital Library Production Service > [email protected] | http://www.umich.edu/~pfs/