Re: div and p
James Cummings <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | IT Services, University of Oxford |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13/01/17 15:16, Paul Schaffner wrote: > Right. divs are semantic / structural units, which may or may not > be indicated by visible markers in the print source. It is not only > possible but extremely common to have divs without heads, trailers, > openers, arguments, or any div-liminal elements at all, or indeed > anything but the logical structure of the text. Yes, I'd agree with that. > (and OTOH, it is of course common to find head-like objects > which do not function as the head of any definable div, and > must therefore be relegated to some other status, e.g. > note or label.) Oh that we agree on. In addition to thinking lots of things are <div>s, and that they aren't necessarily in a fixed order (e.g. are sidebar divs before, after, between the text divs that they intrude into?) I also am more than happy to believe that headings might appear 3/4s of the way down a division. When I encode these in TEII rationalise that it is that they are _rendered_ 3/4s of the way down but that intellectually they are the heading for the whole division. (If they aren't and are a heading for only part of it... well then you get back into the situation where I would fragment into sub-divs and others might not.) -James -- Dr James Cummings, Academic IT Services, University of Oxford, TEI Consultations: [email protected]