Re: MEDEA. Modeling semantically Enriched Digital Edition of Accounts
Robert Foley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I will take a look at @facs rather than embedded page graphics. Thanks Lou. Meanwhile, for an example of our side-by-side XML and manuscript, you can see it here: https://github.com/ConnecticutDigital/Thomas-Bartram-Digital-Archives/blob/master/sandbox/XML_Manuscript-Matchup.png Our TEI file is located here: https://github.com/ConnecticutDigital/Thomas-Bartram-Digital-Archives/blob/master/TEI_XML/Bartram_masterXML_01.xml And our ODD is located here (though currently broken): https://github.com/ConnecticutDigital/Thomas-Bartram-Digital-Archives/blob/master/ODD_Schema/BartramODD.odd Robert > On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Lou Burnard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for circulating this : looks very interesting, and I look forward to discussing your "overarching questions". In the meantime, I have one quick one: > why not use the @facs attribute to point to the page image, rather than an embedded graphic? The two strategies actually mean something quite different, I think. > > >> On 16/01/17 15:33, Robert Foley wrote: >> >> In the next week, we plan on sharing a side-by-side view of our XML and the manuscript texts. To preface the completion of this side-by-side some of our overarching questions include: does our list/list item markup conform to TEI standard AND are we correctly representing account specific symbols with our <g> markup and corresponding <charDecl> in our teiHeader? >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >