Re: MEDEA. Modeling semantically Enriched Digital Edition of Accounts

What do you make of Guidelines examples like this one then?

<facsimile>
  <surfaceGrp n="leaf1">
   <surface>
    <graphic url="page1.png"/>
   </surface>
   <surface>
    <graphic url="page2-highRes.png"/>
    <graphic url="page2-lowRes.png"/>
   </surface>
  </surfaceGrp>
</facsimile>



Am 17.01.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Lou Burnard:
> The distinction is usually pretty clear though, I think. If you use 
> <graphic> you are claiming that at this point in your source there is 
> something
> which you've decided is a graphic, rather than some text. If you use 
> @facs, you are associating some element of your document with a 
> graphical representation of it. In the first case the graphic 
> component is part of the document, in the second it is a 
> representation of the document. These seem fundamentally different to me.
>
> Of course there are always edge cases, notably when you can't decide 
> whether a bit of your source document is a graphic or some text. 
> Consider for example the word "Rotonde" in this snippet 
> https://goo.gl/photos/gCuwYDS9Fc16bK4J6 : you'd probably want to 
> encode it as part of the text (it's the name of a famous bar near the 
> Vavin metro station if you're wondering) but it could plausibly be 
> considered a graphic component too. So all the following seem defensible:
>
> <seg style="some-appropriate-css-style>Rotonde</seg>
> <seg facs="rotonde-image.png">Rotonde</seg>
>
> <zone>
>     <graphic url="rotonde-image.png"/>
>     <seg>Rotonde</seg>
> </zone>
>
>
>   On 17/01/17 09:22, Martin de la Iglesia wrote:
>> There are situations in which you'll want to use <graphic> instead of 
>> or in addition to @facs for pointing to facsimiles; see also the 
>> discussion at <https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1427>.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Martin de la Iglesia
>> Metadata and Data Conversion
>>
>> Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
>> Göttingen State and University Library
>> D-37073 Göttingen
>>
>> Papendiek 14 (Historical Building, Room 1.206)
>> +49 551 39-14070 (Tel.)
>> +49 551 39-3468 (Fax)
>>
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de
>>
>>
>> Am 16.01.2017 um 18:34 schrieb Lou Burnard:
>>> Thanks for circulating this : looks very interesting, and I look 
>>> forward to discussing your "overarching questions". In the meantime, 
>>> I have one quick one:
>>> why not use the @facs attribute to point to the page image, rather 
>>> than an embedded graphic? The two strategies actually mean something 
>>> quite different, I think.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/01/17 15:33, Robert Foley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In the next week, we plan on sharing a side-by-side view of our XML 
>>>> and the manuscript texts. To preface the completion of this 
>>>> side-by-side some of our overarching questions include: does our 
>>>> list/list item markup conform to TEI standard AND are we correctly 
>>>> representing account specific symbols with our <g> markup and 
>>>> corresponding  <charDecl> in our teiHeader?
>>>>
>>>>     >>>
>>>>     >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Martin de la Iglesia
Metadata and Data Conversion

Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Göttingen State and University Library
D-37073 Göttingen

Papendiek 14 (Historical Building, Room 1.206)
+49 551 39-14070 (Tel.)
+49 551 39-3468 (Fax)

[email protected]
http://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de