Fwd: Re: MEDEA. Modeling semantically Enriched Digital Edition of Accounts
Lou Burnard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sigh, Let's try that again with a sensible keyboard. My earlier message didn't make clear that the usage rules for the graphic element are context-dependent. My description related to its usage within the TEXT element. When it's used within a FACSIMILE element (the semantics of which are quite different, after all) it's used differently. Apologies for any residual confusion. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: MEDEA. Modeling semantically Enriched Digital Edition of Accounts Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:51:01 +0000 From: Lou Burnard <[email protected]> Reply-To: Lou Burnard <[email protected]> To: [email protected] I should have made clearer that I was talkibg about the content of a element. The rules for Sent from my Huawei Mobile -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: MEDEA. Modeling semantically Enriched Digital Edition of Accounts From: Martin de la Iglesia To: Lou Burnard ,[email protected] CC: What do you make of Guidelines examples like this one then? <facsimile> <surfaceGrp n="leaf1"> <surface> <graphic url="page1.png"/> </surface> <surface> <graphic url="page2-highRes.png"/> <graphic url="page2-lowRes.png"/> </surface> </surfaceGrp> </facsimile> Am 17.01.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Lou Burnard: The distinction is usually pretty clear though, I think. If you use <graphic> you are claiming that at this point in your source there is something which you've decided is a graphic, rather than some text. If you use @facs, you are associating some element of your document with a graphical representation of it. In the first case the graphic component is part of the document, in the second it is a representation of the document. These seem fundamentally different to me. Of course there are always edge cases, notably when you can't decide whether a bit of your source document is a graphic or some text. Consider for example the word "Rotonde" in this snippet https://goo.gl/photos/gCuwYDS9Fc16bK4J6 : you'd probably want to encode it as part of the text (it's the name of a famous bar near the Vavin metro station if you're wondering) but it could plausibly be considered a graphic component too. So all the following seem defensible: <seg style="some-appropriate-css-style>Rotonde</seg> <seg facs="rotonde-image.png">Rotonde</seg> <zone> <graphic url="rotonde-image.png"/> <seg>Rotonde</seg> </zone> On 17/01/17 09:22, Martin de la Iglesia wrote: There are situations in which you'll want to use <graphic> instead of or in addition to @facs for pointing to facsimiles; see also the discussion at <https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1427> <https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1427><https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1427>. -- Martin de la Iglesia Metadata and Data Conversion Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Göttingen State and University Library D-37073 Göttingen Papendiek 14 (Historical Building, Room 1.206) +49 551 39-14070 (Tel.) +49 551 39-3468 (Fax) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de Am 16.01.2017 um 18:34 schrieb Lou Burnard: Thanks for circulating this : looks very interesting, and I look forward to discussing your "overarching questions". In the meantime, I have one quick one: why not use the @facs attribute to point to the page image, rather than an embedded graphic? The two strategies actually mean something quite different, I think. On 16/01/17 15:33, Robert Foley wrote: In the next week, we plan on sharing a side-by-side view of our XML and the manuscript texts. To preface the completion of this side-by-side some of our overarching questions include: does our list/list item markup conform to TEI standard AND are we correctly representing account specific symbols with our <g> markup and corresponding <charDecl> in our teiHeader? >>> >> -- Martin de la Iglesia Metadata and Data Conversion Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Göttingen State and University Library D-37073 Göttingen Papendiek 14 (Historical Building, Room 1.206) +49 551 39-14070 (Tel.) +49 551 39-3468 (Fax) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de