Re: Correspondence tag-set
Jack Orchard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AM4PR0101MB2291FEB100C15F6B03FCF1D3BE4E0@AM4PR0101MB2291.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> |
Thanks very much, I'll feed anything back that I can find! Jack ________________________________ From: James Cummings <[email protected]> Sent: 04 February 2017 23:03 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Correspondence tag-set Hi Jack, correspDesc corespAction etc were added to the guidelines some time ago. See http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-correspDesc.html And http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/HD.html#HD44CD We'd be interested if you discover things you need to do that the TEI can't cope with. (Feel free to submit issues on github) James -- Dr James Cummings, Academic IT Services, University of Oxford On 4 Feb 2017 11:59 p.m., Jack Orchard <[email protected]> wrote: Hello all, I'm working with Electronic Enlightenment (http://www.e-enlightenment.com) working on eighteenth-century correspondence. EE has its own tagset for letter features and metadata, and I'm working on writing up a concordance between EE and TEI. I'm pretty unfamiliar with TEI at the moment, and I was wondering if anyone here might be able to steer me towards current developments in TEI tagsets for correspondence? I've been looking at correspSearch and CMIF for metadata, but I understand that correspondence features are still being standardised? [http://e-enlightenment.com/images/display/manuscript_w_seal.jpg]<http://www.e-enlightenment.com/> Electronic Enlightenment — letters & lives online<http://www.e-enlightenment.com/> www.e-enlightenment.com Electronic Enlightenment, University of Oxford. Digitizing letters from the 17th–19th centuries, EE reconnects the first global social network. Thank you for your time. Jack Orchard