Re: In manuscript copies, how to encode the date of origin of the original?

Mathias Müller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.tei.general
Message-ID <CAF2XUm04yG7Nxensu0CZRAcvutQcCkbM05N0yRs3q8A=iMjqQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:46 PM, B E Quessel <[email protected]> wrote:

> If this is the description of a  _copy_ of an older manuscript would it
> not be more logical to have two separate records - one for the original and
> one for the copy, each with their own date of origin plus appropriate
> pointers in the respective <filiation > elements?
>
Yes, we do have two separate records for the original manuscript and the
copy. But it is a requirement that in the TEI-encoded version of the
manuscript copy, there is a reference to the date when the original
manuscript was created. I was asking how to best represent the latter.

> The copy record would point to the antigraph, the record for the
> original would point to the apograph. I thought that what filiation is
> for. Or am I misunderstanding the problem here?
>
No, you understood perfectly well. Thanks for pointing out the <filiation>
element!


> Burkhard
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* TEI (Text Encoding Initiative) public discussion list <
> [email protected]> on behalf of Franz Fischer <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* 06 February 2017 11:46:58
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: In manuscript copies, how to encode the date of origin of
> the original?
>
> Dear Mathias,
>
> How about this:
>
> <history>
> <origin>
> <origDate>1589</origDate>
> <date type="original">...</date>
> </origin>
> </history>
>
> Best,
> Franz
>
> Am 06.02.2017 um 11:58 schrieb Mathias Müller:
>
> Dear all
>
> We are TEI-encoding medieval law manuscripts, making use of all the
> elements of the "msdescription" module. I have a question about how to
> encode dates related to those manuscripts.
>
> For original manuscripts, I have encoded the date as follows (showing only
> the relevant part of the header):
>
>          <sourceDesc>
>             <msDesc>
>                <msIdentifier>
>                   <repository>Sample Holdings</repository>
>                   <idno>ex12345</idno>
>                </msIdentifier>
>                <history>
>                   <origin>
>                      <origDate>1589</origDate>
>                   </origin>
>                </history>
>             </msDesc>
>          </sourceDesc>
>
> But for manuscripts that are *copies* of older manuscripts, we have the
> following requirement: we need to encode both the date of origin of the
> copy and the date of origin of the original that the copy refers to. I am
> not sure how to encode both in the same header.
>
> Hence my question:
>
> While encoding a copy of an original manuscript, how to properly represent
> both the date of creation of the copy and the original manuscript? Both
> should be present in our TEI documents, but clearly separated from each
> other.
>
> I am glad to give additional information if needed.
>
> Thanks in advance and kind regards
> Mathias
> —
>
> Mathias Müller
> AND-2-20
> Institute of Computational Linguistics
> University of Zurich
> Switzerland
> +41 44 635 75 81 <+41%2044%20635%2075%2081>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Franz Fischer
> Cologne Center for eHumanities
> Universität zu Köln, Universitätsstr. 22, D-50923 Köln+49 - (0)221 - 470 - 4056 <+49%20221%204704056>[email protected]
> @vranzvischer
> cceh.uni-koeln.de, dixit.uni-koeln.dei-d-e.de, ride.i-d-e.dedigitalmedievalist.org, digitalmedievalist.org/journal
> guillelmus.uni-koeln.de <http://digitalmedievalist.org/journalguillelmus.uni-koeln.de>, confessio.ie
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.