Re: In manuscript copies, how to encode the date of origin of the original?
Mathias Müller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF2XUm04yG7Nxensu0CZRAcvutQcCkbM05N0yRs3q8A=iMjqQw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:46 PM, B E Quessel <[email protected]> wrote: > If this is the description of a _copy_ of an older manuscript would it > not be more logical to have two separate records - one for the original and > one for the copy, each with their own date of origin plus appropriate > pointers in the respective <filiation > elements? > Yes, we do have two separate records for the original manuscript and the copy. But it is a requirement that in the TEI-encoded version of the manuscript copy, there is a reference to the date when the original manuscript was created. I was asking how to best represent the latter. > The copy record would point to the antigraph, the record for the > original would point to the apograph. I thought that what filiation is > for. Or am I misunderstanding the problem here? > No, you understood perfectly well. Thanks for pointing out the <filiation> element! > Burkhard > > Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> > ------------------------------ > *From:* TEI (Text Encoding Initiative) public discussion list < > [email protected]> on behalf of Franz Fischer < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* 06 February 2017 11:46:58 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: In manuscript copies, how to encode the date of origin of > the original? > > Dear Mathias, > > How about this: > > <history> > <origin> > <origDate>1589</origDate> > <date type="original">...</date> > </origin> > </history> > > Best, > Franz > > Am 06.02.2017 um 11:58 schrieb Mathias Müller: > > Dear all > > We are TEI-encoding medieval law manuscripts, making use of all the > elements of the "msdescription" module. I have a question about how to > encode dates related to those manuscripts. > > For original manuscripts, I have encoded the date as follows (showing only > the relevant part of the header): > > <sourceDesc> > <msDesc> > <msIdentifier> > <repository>Sample Holdings</repository> > <idno>ex12345</idno> > </msIdentifier> > <history> > <origin> > <origDate>1589</origDate> > </origin> > </history> > </msDesc> > </sourceDesc> > > But for manuscripts that are *copies* of older manuscripts, we have the > following requirement: we need to encode both the date of origin of the > copy and the date of origin of the original that the copy refers to. I am > not sure how to encode both in the same header. > > Hence my question: > > While encoding a copy of an original manuscript, how to properly represent > both the date of creation of the copy and the original manuscript? Both > should be present in our TEI documents, but clearly separated from each > other. > > I am glad to give additional information if needed. > > Thanks in advance and kind regards > Mathias > — > > Mathias Müller > AND-2-20 > Institute of Computational Linguistics > University of Zurich > Switzerland > +41 44 635 75 81 <+41%2044%20635%2075%2081> > [email protected] > > > > -- > Dr. Franz Fischer > Cologne Center for eHumanities > Universität zu Köln, Universitätsstr. 22, D-50923 Köln+49 - (0)221 - 470 - 4056 <+49%20221%204704056>[email protected] > @vranzvischer > cceh.uni-koeln.de, dixit.uni-koeln.dei-d-e.de, ride.i-d-e.dedigitalmedievalist.org, digitalmedievalist.org/journal > guillelmus.uni-koeln.de <http://digitalmedievalist.org/journalguillelmus.uni-koeln.de>, confessio.ie > >