Re: 1611 King James Bible
Martin Mueller <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Mar 2017 02:16:13 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.tei.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That’s beyond my technical paygrade, though perhaps I could learn how to do this. I worry more about its being ethical, especially when the text is the Bible! On the other hand, if it’s legal and I can get the technical chops that may be what I’ll end up doing. The Hathi Trust has a Bible printed in Cambridge in the 1630’s and it is unquestionably an edition of the Authorized Version. But the underlying OCR is mainly garbage. From: Misha Broughton <[email protected]> Date: Friday, March 17, 2017 at 5:39 PM To: Martin Mueller <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 1611 King James Bible Could you script the downloads with wget or something similar? Misha On Mar 17, 2017 6:14 PM, "Martin Mueller" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Is there a free digital version of the 1611 King James Bible in its original spelling? The TCP doesn’t have it. The Oxford Text Archive has a version in standardized spelling. At http://kingjamesbibleonline.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__kingjamesbibleonline.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=rG8zxOdssqSzDRz4x1GLlmLOW60xyVXydxwnJZpkxbk&m=tM_jBovOuyNdqabvSu4v4WlrkM0_NDLYJdJXPzzc7ro&s=DfHE924K6fuYHE6gJXnQeUIZP1iUoYJwCQhBvjCm0nE&e=> there is an original spelling version, and it is aligned with good images (which appear to come from Penn), but you can’t download it as a whole, though you could get it chapter by chapter, which would be pretty tedious.