Re: type attribute in p

On 13/04/17 17:50, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
> . (TEI P3 was itself a conforming instance of TEI P3, which extended 
> and modified the vocabulary slightly as a way of underscoring the 
> point that extensions and modifications are not shameful or 
> undesirable. At least, that was what at least one of the editors 
> thought and said.) 

? I think you mean "TEI Lite was itself..." I don't remember any way in 
which P3 self-modified.