Re: @xml:base with @rendition (and maybe other pointers)

> On May 6, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Lou Burnard =
<[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> ...
> My apologies if my over hasty attempt to express my own understanding =
of the issue has led to needless confusion. I wasn't trying to summarize =
the whole of a detailed
> technical discussion, just what I thought were its take home messages.=20=



I may have misunderstood what Martin Mueller was asking for; certainly
I misunderstood what Lou was seeking to provide. =20

I think it is sometimes useful, after a complicated technical =
discussion, to
know both what the bottom-line take-home conclusions are, and how they
were reached.  (That is, not just =E2=80=9CDo X=E2=80=9D but some record =
of why one
thinks that X is the right thing to do.)  Not everyone will be
interested in the latter, but it=E2=80=99s important when, a few years =
later,
someone asks =E2=80=9Cwhy on earth do you recommend doing X instead of =
Y?=E2=80=9D.


********************************************
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Black Mesa Technologies LLC
[email protected]
http://www.blackmesatech.com
********************************************