Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages

"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <002a01c81793$daa4e490$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
John H. Jenkins <jenkins at apple dot com> wrote:

>>> If the allocation of CJKV codepoints continues to be donr in this 
>>> way, then for modern CJKV coverage will require not only BMP and 
>>> plane 1 support but also, in the future, plane 3 suport.
>>
>> (Should be plane 2, BTW.)
>
> No, he meant plane 3.  If the current explosion of extremely rare Han 
> characters continues, we'll have to start putting them in plane 3 
> before long.

I am certain that what was meant was, "If the allocation of CJKV code 
points continues to be done in this way, then modern CJKV coverage will 
require not only BMP and plane 2 support but also, in the future, plane 
3 support."

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
NEW E-MAIL -->  dewell at roadrunner dot com
NEW URL -->  http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.