Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages

James Kass <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <11789498.1193413614142.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rustique.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
 
Andrew West wrote,

>Unfortunately the similarity between these two characters means that
>sometimes the wrong character is used. For example, in the on-line
>version of the Kangxi Dictionary U+3ADA is used throughout for the
>entry for U+66F6, and U+66F6 is used throughout for the entry for
>U+3ADA !
>
><http://www.zdic.net/zd/zi/ZdicE6Zdic9BZdicB6.htm> (click on "Kangxi
>Zidian" tab)
><http://www.zdic.net/zd/zi2/ZdicE3ZdicABZdic9A.htm> (click on "Kangxi
>Zidian" tab)
>
>(at least I think they've got the characters the wrong way round --
>but maybe it's me and/or Unihan that is confused)

It's confusing!

There are plenty of "confusables" in CJK Unicode.  (As Andrew
and others on this list know very well.)

More examples:  㒨𠑗 / 㖈䎛
...and, with the meat/flesh vs. moon radicals (which often look
identical in some positions in some fonts) there are several,
㬵胶/㬶𦛩/㬺幐/㬻䐠/䏓朊/䏞𦚜/䑃朦/...

Any of these "confusables" might represent spoofing/phishing
opportunities.

Best regards,

James Kass
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.