Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages
James Kass <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <11789498.1193413614142.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rustique.atl.sa.earthlink.net> |
Andrew West wrote, >Unfortunately the similarity between these two characters means that >sometimes the wrong character is used. For example, in the on-line >version of the Kangxi Dictionary U+3ADA is used throughout for the >entry for U+66F6, and U+66F6 is used throughout for the entry for >U+3ADA ! > ><http://www.zdic.net/zd/zi/ZdicE6Zdic9BZdicB6.htm> (click on "Kangxi >Zidian" tab) ><http://www.zdic.net/zd/zi2/ZdicE3ZdicABZdic9A.htm> (click on "Kangxi >Zidian" tab) > >(at least I think they've got the characters the wrong way round -- >but maybe it's me and/or Unihan that is confused) It's confusing! There are plenty of "confusables" in CJK Unicode. (As Andrew and others on this list know very well.) More examples: 㒨𠑗 / 㖈䎛 ...and, with the meat/flesh vs. moon radicals (which often look identical in some positions in some fonts) there are several, 㬵胶/㬶𦛩/㬺幐/㬻䐠/䏓朊/䏞𦚜/䑃朦/... Any of these "confusables" might represent spoofing/phishing opportunities. Best regards, James Kass