RE: Cost of no OCR for extended Latin
"Don Osborn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00b301c818af$ea95ac00$bfc10400$@net> |
Thanks Lorna and David for this information. I was not familiar with ABBYY FineReader. I have been impressed with use of OmniPage OCR for some kinds of text (in English mainly; occasionally French) that I expected problems with, due to the quality of the originals and the fact I had to scan photocopies. Getting at least as good or better performance in FineReader with at least some extended Latin would be impressive. One hopes to see an expansion of the extended Latin character repertoire to cover languages with multiple diacritics (noting the absence of, among others, Yoruba and Igbo in Africa, and Vietnamese in Asia). Part of the reason for the question is a discussion about ways to promote or develop a project on digitization of African language materials. Ideally one should OCR right the first time, and if the technology permits that for extended Latin orthographies, that's one less problem to overcome. All the best. Don From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:09 AM To: Don Osborn; [email protected] Subject: Re: Cost of no OCR for extended Latin > David Starner wrote on 10/25/2007 05:41:19 AM: > > On 10/25/07, Don Osborn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is anyone aware of an OCR system that recognizes extended Latin characters > > from say Extended A&B, IPA, and Extended Additional ranges? That is for any > > language (orthography) including these characters? > > ABBYY offers most of Extended A and some of Extended B and Additional. > The list of supported languages is > <http://www.abbyy.com/finereader8/?param=44927>, which should map to > the list of supported characters. It would be hard to impossible to > create and test an OCR without a substantial corpus of material using > a character; I suspect many languages are on ABBYY's list only because > the orthography is a subset of those supported for other reasons. Quoting two different colleagues of mine: "I recommend FineReader (www.finereader.com) from Abbyy Software. While OmniPage is good, FineReader is better--the best OCR software at an affordable price...FineReader can handle special characters better than other OCR programs." and "I heartily recommend FineReader. It can be "trained" to recognize speciality characters, and it is surprisingly accurate - about 99% - which means that 1% of the document will require manual corrections." Lorna