Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages

On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:32 PM, John H. Jenkins wrote:

> The "not to encode" status is supposed to mean that either it's  
> already encoded or is a variant of an already encoded variant.  (Not  
> necessarily a unifiable variant, BTW.)  I have an action item to  
> wrap all of the variants into a registered variant set under UTS 37.
>


Actually, a slight correction.  There are two characters in the UTC  
set which have the "not to encode" status for another reason:   
UTC00118 and UTC00326.  The former is, essentially, a dingbat  
occurring in some of the novels by Orson Scott Card, and the latter is  
my standard dummy character used to illustrate the compositional  
nature of the Han script.

=====
John H. Jenkins
[email protected]