Re: Encoding Personal Use Ideographs (was Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting Andrew West <[email protected]>:

> On 02/11/2007, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone think of a 3 stroke character that is on the list of to   
>> be encoded?
>
> Well, CJK-C has U+2A700, U+2A701 and U+2A7EA, as well as one
> two-stroke character, U+2A70B.
>
>> The point of the above being if even fairly common four stroke
>> characters are yet to be enoced there should be no suprize that
>> <U+9F8D U+9580> has not.
>
> My surprise is that it is such an obvious character to create that
> no-one did so hundreds of years ago, and that if anyone did create the
> character that it was not publicised enough to make its way into the
> Kangxi dictionary, and hence into Unicode CJK-B or earlier.
>

The BMP has 148 charcters which are the fanti door U+9F8D over  
something , and Extension B 294 such characters.

John

> Andrew
>



-------------------------------------------------
This message sent through Virus Free Email
http://www.vfemail.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.