Re: logos, symbols, and ligatures
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-On [20071104 23:33], James Kass ([email protected]) wrote: >>> Yes, Adam is right, of course. It is the compound word boundaries >>> which stop ligature formation in German, and not the syllable >>> boundaries which I'd mentioned in an earlier post. >> >> This is not correct. In German, the syllable boundary stops >> ligature formation. > >I'm not an expert on German typesetting. Adam knows much more >about this than I do. > >Quoting from this page, "Typesetting Old German", >http://www.tug.org/TUGboat/Articles/tb12-1/tb31hara.pdf > >"The essential points are the following: 1) don't use ligatures >in Latin Antiqua words, use them in French Antiqua and in >French Fraktur: 2) in a composite word, do not use ligatures >between adjacent letters of two components ..." I wonder if they honestly meant components, for all I know this word has no linguistic meaning. German is like Dutch, for all I know, in the ways you hyphenate words (typically on a syllable basis). And the way you hyphenate determines whether or not you can use ligatures or not. So I have to agree with Werner here, the syllable boundary stops the ligature formation. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ Even when I do things for the sake of others, no sense of amazement or conceit arises. It is just like feeding myself: I hope for nothing in return...