Re: logos, symbols, and ligatures

Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-On [20071104 23:33], James Kass ([email protected]) wrote:
>>> Yes, Adam is right, of course.  It is the compound word boundaries
>>> which stop ligature formation in German, and not the syllable
>>> boundaries which I'd mentioned in an earlier post.
>> 
>> This is not correct.  In German, the syllable boundary stops
>> ligature formation.
>
>I'm not an expert on German typesetting.  Adam knows much more
>about this than I do.
>
>Quoting from this page, "Typesetting Old German",
>http://www.tug.org/TUGboat/Articles/tb12-1/tb31hara.pdf
>
>"The essential points are the following: 1) don't use ligatures
>in Latin Antiqua words, use them in French Antiqua and in
>French Fraktur: 2) in a composite word, do not use ligatures
>between adjacent letters of two components ..."

I wonder if they honestly meant components, for all I know this word has no
linguistic meaning.

German is like Dutch, for all I know, in the ways you hyphenate words
(typically on a syllable basis). And the way you hyphenate determines whether
or not you can use ligatures or not. So I have to agree with Werner here, the
syllable boundary stops the ligature formation.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/
Even when I do things for the sake of others, no sense of amazement or
conceit arises. It is just like feeding myself: I hope for nothing in return...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.