Re: logos, symbols, and ligatures
"David Starner" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/5/07, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > > c) there is no need for a ligature anyway, so why force one (that is > > visually distinct from not ligating) for "fliegen", or > > Is there ever a typographical need for a ligature in the latin script? Yes, of course. fl and fi exist solely for typographic reasons; with fi in particular, you either get an awkward space between the two, or you get the top of the f crashing into the dot of the i.