Re: Encoding Personal Use Ideographs

"James Kass" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <09f201c8200c$919c11c0$b458d942@yourus67pi6luv>
John H. Jenkins wrote,

> Yes.  There are several problems.  A FAQ has just been added to the  
> Unicode Web site to call attention to them <http://www.unicode.org/faq/han_cjk.html#24 

Thank you for the new FAQ concerning why a compositional
model for CJK encoding is unwelcome.

"Always listen to experts.  They'll tell you what can't be done 
and why.  Then do it."   (Robert Heinlein)

Although the pitfalls are well-known, solutions exist.

Meanwhile, what is the official position concerning ideographic
description sequences (and possible glyph generation from same) 
for representing unlikely-to-ever-be-encoded personal ideographs
in plain text?

Best regards,

James Kass
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.