Re: Encoding Personal Use Ideographs
"James Kass" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <09f201c8200c$919c11c0$b458d942@yourus67pi6luv> |
John H. Jenkins wrote, > Yes. There are several problems. A FAQ has just been added to the > Unicode Web site to call attention to them <http://www.unicode.org/faq/han_cjk.html#24 Thank you for the new FAQ concerning why a compositional model for CJK encoding is unwelcome. "Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done and why. Then do it." (Robert Heinlein) Although the pitfalls are well-known, solutions exist. Meanwhile, what is the official position concerning ideographic description sequences (and possible glyph generation from same) for representing unlikely-to-ever-be-encoded personal ideographs in plain text? Best regards, James Kass